Why BBC is Microsoft Media (Video)
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
- Modified: 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
Recent Techrights' Posts
- Microsoft-Connected Sites Trying to Shift Attention Away From Microsoft's Megabreach Only Days Before Important If Not Unprecedented Grilling by the US Government?
- Why does the mainstream media not entertain the possibility a lot of these talking points are directed out of Redmond?
- Firefox Has Fallen to 2% in New Zealand
- At around 2%, at least in the US (2% or below this threshold), there's no longer an obligation to test sites for any Gecko-based browser
-
- GNU/Linux in Georgia: Looking Good
- Windows down from 99% to less than 33%
- Tomorrow is a Historic Day for Press Freedom in the UK
- Take note of the Julian Assange case
- Hiding in a Forest Without a Phone and Hiding Behind the First Amendment in the United States (US)
- some serial defamer is trying to invert the narrative
- Links 19/05/2024: Iran's President Lost in Helicopter Crash, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Awaits Decisions in Less Than a Day
- Links for the day
- Links 19/05/2024: Microsoft Investigated in Europe
- Links for the day
- 4 Old Articles About Microsoft/IBM SystemD
- old but still relevant
- Winning Streak
- Free software prevalence
- Links 19/05/2024: Conflicts, The Press, and Spotify Lawsuit
- Links for the day
- GNU/Linux+ChromeOS at Over 7% in New Zealand
- It's also the home of several prominent GNU/Linux advocates
- libera.chat (Libera Chat) Turns 3 Today
- Freenode in the meantime continues to disintegrate
- [Teaser] Freenode NDA Expires in a Few Weeks (What Really Happened 3 Years Ago)
- get ready
- GNU/Linux is Already Mainstream, But Microsoft is Still Trying to Sabotage That With Illegal Activities and Malicious Campaigns of Lies
- To help GNU/Linux grow we'll need to tackle tough issues and recognise Microsoft is a vicious obstacle
- Slovenia's Adoption of GNU/Linux in 2024
- Whatever the factor/s may be, if these figures are true, then it's something to keep an eye on in the future
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 18, 2024
- IRC logs for Saturday, May 18, 2024
- Links 19/05/2024: Profectus Beta 1.2
- Links for the day
- Site Archives (Not WordPress)
- We've finally finished the work
- [Meme] The EPO Delusion
- on New Ways of Working
- EPO Representatives Outline Latest Attacks on Staff
- Not much has happened recently in terms of industrial action
- Links 18/05/2024: Revisiting the Harms of Patent Trolls, Google Tries to Bypass (or Plagiarise) Sites Under the Guise of "AI"
- Links for the day
- Links 18/05/2024: BASIC Story, Site Feeds, and New in Geminispace
- Links for the day
- GNU/Linux in Kyrgyzstan: From 0.5% to 5% in Eight Years
- the country is almost the size of the UK
- Justice for Victims of Online Abuse
- The claims asserted or pushed forth by the harasser are categorically denied
- [Meme] Senior Software Engineer for Windows
- This is becoming like another Novell
- Links 18/05/2024: Deterioration of the Net, North Korean IT Workers in the US
- Links for the day
- Windows in Lebanon: Down to 12%?
- latest from statCounter
- [Video] 'Late Stage Capitalism': Microsoft as an Elaborate Ponzi Scheme (Faking 'Demand' While Portraying the Fraud as an Act of Generosity and Demanding Bailouts)
- Being able to express or explain the facts isn't easy because of the buzzwords
- Links 18/05/2024: Caledonia Emergency Powers, "UK Prosecutor's Office Went Too Far in the Assange Case"
- Links for the day
- Microsoft ("a Dying Megacorporation that Does Not Create") and IBM: An Era of Dying Giants With Leadership Deficits and Corporate Bailouts (Subsidies From Taxpayers)
- Microsoft seems to be resorting to lots of bribes and chasing of bailouts (i.e. money from taxpayers worldwide)
- US Patent and Trademark Office Sends Out a Warning to People Who Do Not Use Microsoft's Proprietary Formats
- They're punishing people who wish to use open formats
- Links 18/05/2024: Fury in Microsoft Over Studio Shutdowns, More Gaming Layoffs
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 17, 2024
- IRC logs for Friday, May 17, 2024
- Links 18/05/2024: KOReader, Benben v0.5.0 Progress Update, and More
- Links for the day
- [Meme] UEFI 'Secure' Boot Boiling Frog
- UEFI 'Secure' Boot: You can just ignore it. You can just turn it off. You can hack on it as a workaround. Just use Windows dammit!
- The Market Wants to Delete Windows and Install GNU/Linux, UEFI 'Secure' Boot Must Go!
- To be very clear, this has nothing to do with security and those who insist that it is have absolutely no credentials
- In the United States Of America the Estimated Share of Google Search Grew After Microsoft's Chatbot Hype (Which Coincided With Mass Layoffs at Bing)
- Microsoft's chatbot hype started in late 2022
- Techrights Will Categorically Object to Any Attempts to Deny Its Right to Publish Informative, Factual Material
- we'll continue to publish about 20 pages per day while challenging censorship attempts
- Links 17/05/2024: Microsoft Masks Layoffs With Return-to-office (RTO) Mandates, More YouTube Censorship
- Links for the day
- YouTube Progresses to the Next Level
- YouTube is a ticking time bomb
- Journalists and Human Rights Groups Back Julian Assange Ahead of Monday's Likely Very Final Decision
- From the past 24 hours...
- [Meme] George Washington and the Bill of Rights
- Centuries have passed since the days of George Washington, but the principles are still the same
- Daniel Pocock: "I've Gone to Some Lengths to Demonstrate How Corporate Bad Actors Have Used Amateur-hour Codes of Conduct to Push Volunteers Into Modern Slavery"
- "As David explains, the Codes of Conduct should work the other way around to regulate the poor behavior of corporations who have been far too close to the Debian Suicide Cluster."
- Video of Richard Stallman's Talk From Four Weeks Ago
- 2-hour video of Richard Stallman speaking less than a month ago
- statCounter Says Twitter/X Share in Russia Fell From 23% to 2.3% in 3 Years
- it seems like YouTube gained a lot
- Journalist Who Won Awards for His Coverage of the Julian Assange Ordeals Excluded and Denied Access to Final Hearing
- One can speculate about the true reason/s
- Richard Stallman's Talk, Scheduled for Two Days Ago, Was Not Canceled But Really Delayed
- American in Paris
- 3 More Weeks for Daniel Pocock's Campaign to Win a Seat in European Parliament Elections
- Friday 3 weeks from now is polling day
- Microsoft Should Have Been Fined and Sanctioned Over UEFI 'Lockout' (Locking GNU/Linux Out of New PCs)
- Why did that not happen?
- Gemini Links 16/05/2024: Microsoft Masks Layoffs With Return-to-office (RTO) Mandates, Cash Issues
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 16, 2024
- IRC logs for Thursday, May 16, 2024
- Ex-Red Hat CEO Paul Cormier Did Not Retire, He Just Left IBM/Red Hat a Month Ago (Ahead of Layoff Speculations)
- Rather than retire he took a similar position at another company
- Linux.com Made Its First 'Article' in Over and Month, It Was 10 Words in Total, and It's Not About Linux
- play some 'webapp' and maybe get some digital 'certificate' for a meme like 'clown computing'
Comments
Faemir
2008-06-25 21:25:35
In fact I wouldn't be surprised if they swapped to using dirac for the iplayer, atleast optionally at some point.
This is almost as bad as MS FUD.
Ben
2008-06-26 07:44:14
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 07:59:36
As for DIRAC, that's the 'Old BBC'. The new BBC (media division) is managed by Microsoft folks, some of whom came from Microsoft.
Ben
2008-06-26 10:33:44
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 14:18:21
This post contains only a video (showing you a hearing at the Parliament) and 4 links. Where are accusations made? If you challenge previous posts, then be specific and I'll gladly provide evidence. Don't rush and shoot the messenger.
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:19:14
Some of the links are pretty suspicious too - one, still being links to your own site, and 2, the fact that BBC made a documentary on Bill (a series called the Money Programme about history of many of todays biggest businesses) and while it focused more on his retirement, still had time to bring up some criticism including "talking head" sections from his critics. While it wasn't comprehensive, it seemed to be something a little more lighter anyway rather than a hard case expose.
Then, as already mentioned, the investment in Dirac.
There's been a spotty past, but even so they've tried, and are mostly tied by what is currently popular (flash, and at one point using Realmedia/WMP based players, which they realised they had to move away from and did).
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:45:50
Watchnig that video, there is so much stuff said in the text that makes us out as no worse than the people we're accusing of FUD. First of all:
It's easy to be a smart arse when you're not under interview pressure and have google to hand to check the figures, while she, being a human being, is not a perfect human being, and even so did remember the rough estimate (as noted during the interview, excuses staff payment, so I don't really see how the figure mentioned in the text is debunking or showing anything - it was clear to all it seemed that this was excusing that, and if it wasn't, it was mentioned by her anyway).
Unfounded claims of Silverlight wrapper (despite it's linux based back end and the fact it uses flash, and works fine for streaming on all systems), and while downloading is a bitch to not have, you have to remember is copyrighted original works, therefore has to be protected, making it harder to get around the Linux/open source side of things, and even if they did they'd probably complain because they wouldn't release the source of something that is meant to seal off/protect the content entirely (Firefox can get away with it because a lot of exploits are down to bugs and such, not that it has to protect copyrighted works from piracy of course - that's down the content of the page, not the browser).
Then the incredibly presumptive text in general that doesn't bring up anything - it just spins and suggests FUD to make the interviewees sound suspicious when for the most part they haven't said anything deserving of that, except for the interoperability part being on all platforms, which considering the confusion they seemed to have over what they meant, could've been an honest mistake or a slip of the tongue. The clip itself sadly only shows a very specific part too, not the whole thing, which would be better.
Ben
2008-06-27 12:26:24
During the video, the subtitles were serious accusations but no evidence to back it up. Some examples:
at 0:43 : "In fact, the IPlayer cost more than 130 Million! (See Grocklaw.net)." Your accusing the BBC of giving dodgy figures yet no direct links to any evidence, asking viewers to search through a huge site or take our word for it. (And for the record I did find the interview, 130 Million was the cost of modernising the entire BBC from tape based to digital based, Iplayer itself was about 4.5 Million.) And a real citation ;) http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 look for [14:49]
at 3:25: "Because his pals at Microsoft Told him to". That's a serious allegation against both the BBC and Microsoft. And without any evidence its pure FUD.
at 3:54: "No its a monopoly tool created by Microsoft". Well firstly that makes no sense given the context. MP "Why did you build Iplayer, why not use BitTorrent or BTVision" BBC Director "Actually Iplayer isn't an internal BBC creation* we did use external tools" * Subtitle appears here
at 3:13: "By Microsoft...", He doesn't actually name the various components (and why should he, it wouldn't answer the question). And the strong implication is that using Microsoft technology is bad, probably is but unless you say why (and it has to be a good reason), or specifically link to someone who says why, its nothing but FUD.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-27 12:46:50
BBC iPlayer protest report
"We have 1500 fliers to distribute, that focus on the key issue with the iPlayer, and why $130 Million and 4 years of development don't get you much when you choose Microsoft DRM."
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/iPlayerProtestReport
re: second point
Bear in mind that I didn't edit or produce the video, but just to bear in mind: Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee who also attended antitrust proceedings in Europe (over Windows Media Player abuses, IIRC).
re: third point
Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?
Feeling the heat at Microsoft
[CNET]: If I ask you who is Microsoft's biggest competitor now, who would it be?
[Ballmer:] Open...Linux. I don't want to say open source. Linux, certainly have to go with that.
http://www.news.com/Feeling-the-heat-at-Microsoft/2008-1012_3-6232458.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc
re: fourth and last point
Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this.
Mark Kent
2008-06-27 13:01:08
The BBC DG (the top bod, responding to a parliament questioning) could only admit to "more than €£20 millions", which indicates quite clearly that it's a lot more, and they were not going to say quite how much. Suggesting that the BBC's DG and his advisers would be so incompetent as to be unable to answer "what does it cost" to a parliamentary committee specifically set up to investigate the iPlayer is ludicruous. If he's really that incompetent, he should find another job, along with his advisers.
The Dirac codec was developed years before the Microsoft iPlayer disaster came along, which was the result of some ex-Microsoft people joining the BBC in their new "media" section, and doing a deal back with Microsoft. There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft's interests.
The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions with Microsoft for something which is so locked to a specific version of windows that hardly anyone can use it, cost a tiny fraction of the Microsoft version, and has been very succesful.
The BBC's main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was "DRM", amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one.
The key party in the BBC eventually lost his job over the whole fiasco, and rightly so in my view. I was disgusted, and remain disgusted, at the amount of my own money (licence-fee) wasted on this ill-advised proprietary junk from Microsoft.
Ta,
Mark
Ben
2008-06-28 07:39:46
"Bear in mind that I didn’t edit or produce the video," Dosn't matter. Posting it on your blog without commentary is a full endorsement, if you do that you have to take responsibility for any inacuracies.
I have no idea why they said >€£20 Million to parliament, but that's a guestimate, if you want accurate figures read the interview where he actually had them on hand. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171
"Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee" If he's part of an evil plot to take over the BBC from within then take him down. But unless you have actual evidence he's deliberately doing evil its pure FUD to claim he's part of a sinister plan.
"Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?" Technical reasons, prioritising by user count, maybe they wanted to get the public response and make changes before they started porting. Who knows? But jumping to the worst conclusion without evidence is FUD. Besides the online verison is cross platform and it was worth a little teathing troubles to get hold of.
"Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this." Nope, Iplayer's online Flash version is compliant with internet de-facto standards (and its not like there is an official standard to use anyway), cross platform and pretty high quality. I don't know if there's any web 2.0 features people are missing but if you want to watch some BBC TV online, its great.
The Downloadable client according to the digital grapevine (I never used it) shoddy and tied to Microsoft. But that dosn't prove anything. You can say the same about any badly written peace of Windows software in existence.
"There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft’s interests." Iplayer has an online flash version. Its far more popular than the downloadable version (even with Windows users) and fully supports Linux. I use it and I have no complaints.
"The BBC’s main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was “DRM”, amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one." The BBC isn't pro-DRM, if you read what they actually said http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 its that DRM was a nessacary evil, not because of pirates, but because they needed to convince the copyright holders to allow Iplayer to allow their shows online, DRM convinced them. If they can convince them to allow their shows on the Flash version of Iplayer without DRM, nice work BBC!
"The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions" IPlayer itself did not cost €£120 million, the €£120 million was spent restructureing the BBC without witch the Flash Iplayer could not have been built. I agree the downloadable Iplayer was a waste of time and money, I just don't see an evil intent, but please, get your figures right.